Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 21;8(5):2623–2635. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2079

Table 1.

Socio‐demographic and clinico‐pathologic characteristics of our included study participants stratified by immigrant status. P values represent comparisons between immigrant patients and nonimmigrant patients

Variable Subgroup Total patients, n = 784 (%) Immigrant patients, n = 309 (%) Nonimmigrant patients, n = 475 (%) P value
Socio‐demographic variables
Gender Male 47% 48% 46% 0.61
Age at diagnosis Median (range) 56 (18‐97) 58 (18‐91) 56 (18‐97) 0.07
Follow‐up time Median (range) 24 (0‐120) 25 (0‐120) 23 (0‐120) 0.18
Language at home English 91% 79% 100% <0.001
Employment status Employed/Equivalent 40% 36% 42% 0.07
Employment type White collar job 71% 72% 71% 0.87
Marital status Married/common‐law 72% 73% 71% 0.68
Education Received any post‐secondary studies 72% 75% 71% 0.22
Household income ≥ $100,000/year 39% 34% 42% 0.02
Self‐rated health Very good to excellent 35% 29% 39% 0.004
ECOG 0 47% 44% 49% 0.16
Immigration date Remote (≥40 years ago) 46%
Immigration region Western 57%
Clinico‐pathological variables
Disease stage Localized 73% 71% 74% 0.67
Metastatic 10% 11% 9%
Hematologic 17% 18% 16%
Treatment intent at diagnosis Curative 80% 77% 81% 0.32
Treatment intent at follow‐up (survey time) Curative 69% 65% 71% 0.16
Systemic therapy Received 62% 65% 60% 0.13
Radiation therapy Received 47% 47% 47% 0.88
Surgery Received 60% 61% 59% 0.71