Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 6;26(3):291–301. doi: 10.1177/1526602819840697

Table 2.

Procedure and Target Lesion Characteristics of 316 Subjects With Subacute vs Acute Limb Ischemia.a

Characteristics All Subjects (n=316) Subacute Ischemia (n=114) Acute Ischemia (n=202) pb
Target occlusion length, cm 22.9±14.8 20.2±13.7 24.5±15.2 0.016
Thrombosis 256 (81.0) 104 (91.2) 152 (75.2) <0.001
Embolism 60 (19.0) 10 (8.8) 50 (24.8) <0.001
Femoropopliteal segment occlusion 231 (73.1) 90 (78.9) 141 (69.8) 0.087
Femoropopliteal bypass occlusion 72 (22.8) 20 (17.5) 52 (25.7) 0.124
Aortoiliac segment occlusion 35 (11.1) 7 (6.1) 28 (13.9) 0.040
Deep femoral artery occlusion 32 (10.1) 6 (5.3) 26 (12.9) 0.033
In-stent occlusion 74 (23.4) 25 (21.9) 49 (24.3) 0.680
Additional infrapopliteal lesion 195 (61.7) 57 (50.0) 138 (68.3) 0.002
Residual stenosis after RTX alone, % 38.4±26.1 43.8±23.8 35.3±26.8 0.008
Residual stenosis length after RTX alone, cm 3.8±4.9 4.5±5.8 3.4±4.2 0.007
Stented length, cm 4.3±6.9 4.4±7.5 4.2±6.6 0.891
RTX run time, min 2.3±1.2 2.2±1.2 2.3±1.1 0.488
Number of RTX passes 3.4±1.1 3.3±1.2 3.4±1.1 0.130
Dilation after RTX 245 (77.5) 102 (89.5) 143 (70.8) <0.001
Stenting after RTX 139 (44.0) 51 (44.7) 88 (43.6) 0.906
Aspirationc in target vessel 25 (7.9) 7 (6.1) 18 (8.9) 0.516

Abbreviation: RTX, Rotarex catheter.

a

Continuous data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation; categorical data are given as the number (percentage).

b

Acute vs subacute.

c

Percutaneous aspiration thromboembolectomy.