Table 1. Characteristics of Cohorts and Clinical Trials.
Sepsis Endotyping in Emergency Care (SENECA)a | Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS)9 | A Controlled Comparison of Eritoran in Severe Sepsis (ACCESS)6 | Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS)8 | Protocol-Based Care for Early Septic Shock (ProCESS)7 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Derivation Cohort | Validation Cohort | |||||
No. of patients | 20 189 | 43 086 | 583 | 1706b | 1690 | 1341 |
No. of sites | 12 | 12 | 28 | 197 | 164 | 31 |
Enrollment period | 2010-2012 | 2013-2014 | 2001-2003 | 2006-2010 | 1998-2000 | 2008-2013 |
Location of enrollment | ED | ED | ED | ED, medical ward, ICU | ED, medical ward, ICU | ED |
Primary intervention | None | None | None | Eritoran (toll-like receptor 4 antagonist) vs placebo | Drotrecogin alfa (activated protein C) vs placebo | EGDT as standard care vs usual care |
Primary outcome | 28-d mortalityc | 28-d mortalityc | 28-d mortality | 28-d mortality | 28-d mortality | 60-d mortality |
Inclusion criteria | Sepsis-3 criteria (defined as both a body fluid culture and administration of antibiotics plus ≥2 SOFA points within first 6 h after ED arrival) | Sepsis-3 criteria (defined as both a body fluid culture and administration of antibiotics plus ≥2 SOFA points within first 6 h after ED arrival) | Community-acquired pneumonia with severe sepsis (defined by Sepsis-2 criteria and ≥3 SOFA points) | Severe sepsis and septic shock (defined as meeting ≥3 SIRS criteria, dysfunction in ≥1 organ, and APACHE II score of 21-37) | Severe sepsis and septic shock (defined as meeting ≥3 SIRS criteria and dysfunction in ≥1 organ) | Severe sepsis or septic shock (defined as meeting ≥2 SIRS criteria and either serum lactate level ≥4 mmol/L or refractory hypotension) |
Abbreviations: APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; ED, emergency department; EGDT, early goal-directed therapy; ICU, intensive care unit; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.
There were 16 552 unique patients among 20 189 total patients in the derivation cohort and 31 160 unique patients among 43 086 total patients in the validation cohort.
Indicates total with available data.
Measured among unique patients in each cohort.