Table 1.
T1DM-hospitalisation | T2DM-hospitalisation | |||||
Total n=10 617 | Men n=5431 (51.1%) | Women n=5276 (49.6%) | Total n=93 508 | Men n=51 736 (55.3%) | Women n=47 048 (50.3%) | |
Age (years) | ||||||
<40 | 3886 (36.6%) | 1596 (29.3%) | 2290 (43.4%) | 1137 (1.2%) | 409 (0.7%) | 728 (1.5%) |
40–49 | 1348 (12.6%) | 648 (11.9%) | 700 (13.2%) | 3589 (3.8%) | 1692 (3.2%) | 1894 (4.0%) |
50–59 | 1902 (17.9%) | 1046 (19.2%) | 856 (16.2%) | 11 848 (12.6%) | 6860 (13.2%) | 4988 (10.6%) |
60–69 | 1858 (17.5%) | 1105 (20.3%) | 753 (14.2%) | 23 791 (25.4%) | 14 529 (28.0%) | 9262 (19.6%) |
70–79 | 991 (9.3%) | 627 (11.5%) | 364 (6.8%) | 29 248 (31.2%) | 16 400 (31.6%) | 12 848 (27.3%) |
≥80 | 632 (5.9%) | 319 (5.8%) | 313 (5.9%) | 23 898 (25.5%) | 11 846 (22.8%) | 12 052 (25.6%) |
Socioeconomic status (IRSAD) of local government area | ||||||
Decile 1 (most disadvantaged) | 775 (7.2%) | – | – | 7595 (8.1%) | – | – |
Decile 2 | 381 (3.5%) | – | – | 3714 (3.9%) | – | – |
Decile 3 | 441 (4.1%) | – | – | 6298 (6.7%) | – | – |
Decile 4 | 3046 (28.6%) | – | – | 21 351 (22.8%) | – | – |
Decile 5 | 4832 (45.5%) | – | – | 43 805 (46.8%) | – | – |
Decile 6 | – | – | – | – | ||
Decile 7 | 614 (5.7%) | – | – | 5936 (6.3%) | – | – |
Decile 8 | 266 (2.5%) | – | – | 1930 (2.0%) | – | – |
Decile 9 | 31 (0.2%) | – | – | 651 (0.6%) | – | – |
Decile 10 (most advantaged) | 231 (2.1%) | – | – | 2229 (2.3%) | – | – |
Accessibility/remoteness (ARIA) of local government area | ||||||
Moderately accessible (lowest accessibility) | 287 (2.7%) | – | – | 3806 (4.0%) | – | – |
Accessible | 1835 (17.2%) | – | – | 21 015 (22.4%) | – | – |
Highly accessible (highest accessibility) | 8495 (80.0%) | – | – | 68 688 (73.4%) | – | – |
ACDI, Ageing, Chronic Disease and Injury; ARIA, Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia; IRSAD, Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.