Skip to main content
. 2019 May 22;9(5):e026880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026880

Table 1.

Overview of T1DM-hospitalisations and T2DM-hospitalisations in the ACDI region during 2011–2014 inclusive, by age group, sex, socioeconomic status and accessibility, presented as n (%)

T1DM-hospitalisation T2DM-hospitalisation
Total n=10 617 Men n=5431 (51.1%) Women n=5276 (49.6%) Total n=93 508 Men n=51 736 (55.3%) Women n=47 048 (50.3%)
Age (years)
  <40 3886 (36.6%) 1596 (29.3%) 2290 (43.4%) 1137 (1.2%) 409 (0.7%) 728 (1.5%)
  40–49 1348 (12.6%) 648 (11.9%) 700 (13.2%) 3589 (3.8%) 1692 (3.2%) 1894 (4.0%)
  50–59 1902 (17.9%) 1046 (19.2%) 856 (16.2%) 11 848 (12.6%) 6860 (13.2%) 4988 (10.6%)
  60–69 1858 (17.5%) 1105 (20.3%) 753 (14.2%) 23 791 (25.4%) 14 529 (28.0%) 9262 (19.6%)
  70–79 991 (9.3%) 627 (11.5%) 364 (6.8%) 29 248 (31.2%) 16 400 (31.6%) 12 848 (27.3%)
  ≥80 632 (5.9%) 319 (5.8%) 313 (5.9%) 23 898 (25.5%) 11 846 (22.8%) 12 052 (25.6%)
Socioeconomic status (IRSAD) of local government area
  Decile 1 (most disadvantaged) 775 (7.2%) 7595 (8.1%)
  Decile 2 381 (3.5%) 3714 (3.9%)
  Decile 3 441 (4.1%) 6298 (6.7%)
  Decile 4 3046 (28.6%) 21 351 (22.8%)
  Decile 5 4832 (45.5%) 43 805 (46.8%)
  Decile 6
  Decile 7 614 (5.7%) 5936 (6.3%)
  Decile 8 266 (2.5%) 1930 (2.0%)
  Decile 9 31 (0.2%) 651 (0.6%)
  Decile 10 (most advantaged) 231 (2.1%) 2229 (2.3%)
Accessibility/remoteness (ARIA) of local government area
  Moderately accessible (lowest accessibility) 287 (2.7%) 3806 (4.0%)
  Accessible 1835 (17.2%) 21 015 (22.4%)
  Highly accessible (highest accessibility) 8495 (80.0%) 68 688 (73.4%)

ACDI, Ageing, Chronic Disease and Injury; ARIA, Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia; IRSAD, Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.