Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 28.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jul;51(1 Suppl 1):S62–S68. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.003

Table 1.

Overall Comparison of Standard Care Model Versus Integrative Model

Standard asthma care model: asthma specialty clinic separate from sickle cell clinic (2010–2012) Integrated sickle cell and asthma clinic (2013–2014)
Number and location of initiation of asthma action plans for new diagnoses
 Asthma clinic (n=16) 4 (44%) 0
 Sickle cell clinic (n=16) 5 (56%) 16 (100%)*
Spirometry utilization
 Participants ≥5 years of age (n=41) 27 (65%) 39 (95%)**
Correction of lower airway obstruction after therapy
 FEV1/FVC <5th percentile (n=10for both groups) 3 (30%) 8 (80%)*
Asthma exacerbations
 Emergency department and hospital encounters per 100 patient-years 9.29 6.56
 Systemic corticosteroids administered 18 11
Hospitalizations for vaso-occlusive pain per 100 patient-years
 Entire cohort 51 62
 Hemoglobin SS and sickle beta thalassemia null 54.6 48.9
 Hemoglobin SC and sickle beta thalassemia + 28.6 92.9*
Hospitalizations for acute chest syndrome per 100 patient-years
 Entire cohort 24 20
 Hemoglobin SS and sickle beta thalassemia null 21.3 26.6
 Hemoglobin SC and sickle beta thalassemia + 26.2 17.9

Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (*p<0.05; **p<0.01).

FEV1/FVC, the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity.