Skip to main content
. 2019 May 28;9:7956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44339-4

Table 1.

Contingency table comparing conventional and refined intrinsic subtypes among 1097-case TCGA BC cohort.

Refined intrinsic subtype
Basal Her2 LA LB Normal Sum

Conventional

Intrinsic

subtype

Basal 185 5 0 2 0 192
Her2 0 82 0 0 0 82
LA 0 7 452 107 0 566
LB 0 1 0 216 0 217
Normal 1 5 21 2 11 40
Sum 186 100 473 327 11 1097

For the plots in Fig. 4, we used the patients that are either LA or LB in both conventional and refined subtypes (underlined).