Skip to main content
. 2019 May 28;9:7956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44339-4

Table 2.

Contingency table comparing conventional and refined intrinsic subtypes among all 989-case METABRIC study cohort.

Refined intrinsic subtype
Basal Her2 LA LB Normal Sum

Conventional

Intrinsic

subtype

Basal 100 13 0 2 0 115
Her2 0 84 0 0 0 84
LA 0 8 355 102 0 465
LB 0 1 0 267 0 268
Normal 1 7 29 2 18 57
Sum 101 113 384 373 18 989

For the plots in Fig. 6, we used the patients that are either LA or LB in both conventional and refined subtypes (underlined).