Skip to main content
. 2019 May 29;39(22):4365–4374. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2102-18.2018

Table 2.

Regions of increased BOLD activation during study and test in the recall success contrast of interest

Lat Region Peak x, y, z Cluster size (voxels) T value
Study
    R Precuneus 6, −68, 46 1242 6.19
    R Angular gyrus 44, −54, 54 515 5.01
    R Middle temporal gyrus 66, −24, −8 80 5.02
    R Middle cingulate gyrus 4, −18, 30 214 4.87
    R Middle frontal gyrus 32, 66, 2 225 4.52
    L Angular gyrus −38, −62, 42 955 5.9
    L Middle temporal gyrus −64, −38, −8 348 5.63
    L Middle frontal gyrus −30, 58, 0 216 4.65
Test
    R Cerebellum 38, −56, −38 1376 7.13
    R Angular gyrus 42, −50, 20 1648 5.62
    R Superior frontal gyrus 22, 30, 48 482 5.19
    R Caudate 16, 2, 26 172 5.1
    R Postcentral gyrus 50, −10, 26 247 5.05
    R Hippocampus 28, −34, −4 74 4.99
    R Middle frontal gyrus 58, −40, −14 98 4.7
    L Supramarginal gyrusa −50, −40, 42 5356 7.9
    L Angular gyrus −50, −62, 32
    L Superior frontal gyrus −20, 26, 56 5047 7.76
    L Precuneus −6, −52, 30 4494 7.69
    L Inferior frontal gyrus −54, 12, 8 1882 6.96
    L Hippocampus −26, −28, −10 321 6.57
    L Supplementary motor cortex −4, 2, 62 123 5.95
    L Putamen −12, 8, −12 135 5.88
    L Thalamus −8, −28, 8 84 5.04
    L Cerebellumb −18, −64, −26 75 4.99
    L −36, −74, −42 236 4.89

Shown are all regions arising from the contrast of interest at a threshold of p < 0.05 FWE cluster-level corrected with voxel-level threshold at p < 0.0001 (uncorrected). Anatomical labels were provided by the Neuromorphometrics atlas, available via SPM (Neuromorphometrics, Inc.: http://www.neuromorphometrics.com/).

aCluster included local maxima in the supramarginal gyrus and the angular gyrus.

bTwo local maxima were observed in the left cerebellum at test.