Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 30;16(9):1533. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091533

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of the effects comparison of HIIT and MICT interventions on CRF in children and adolescents.

Subgroup No. of Trials/Total No. (%) Subjects (n) SMD (95% CI) Favors
HIIT
Favors
MICT
P Value P for
Interaction
All studies 18/18 (100) 563 0.51 (0.33, 0.69) graphic file with name ijerph-16-01533-i001.jpg 0.00
Modality of INT
Cycling 5/17 (29) 153 0.54 (0.16, 0.92) 0.04 0.94
Running 12/17 (71) 382 0.53 (0.31, 0.75) 0.00
INT duration
≤8 weeks 8/18 (44) 212 0.41 (0.14, 0.68) 0.01 0.23
>8 weeks 10/18 (56) 351 0.59 (0.35, 0.84) 0.00
Work: rest ratio
≤1 8/17 (47) 207 0.38 (0.10, 0.66) 0.08 0.16
>1 9/17 (53) 252 0.60 (0.35, 0.86) 0.00
Total bouts
≤180 8/14 (57) 242 0.46 (0.20, 0.71) 0.01 0.91
>180 6/14 (43) 149 0.44 (0.11, 0.76) 0.01
Risk of bias
high 3/18 (17) 41 0.42 (0.21, 0.63) 0.00 0.75
Medium 14/18 (77) 497 0.77 (0.19, 1.23) 0.00
Low 1/18 (6) 25 0.79 (0.33, 1.39) 0.01

CRF, Cardiorespiratory fitness; HIIT, high-intensity interval training; MICT, moderate-intensity continuously training; INT, intervention.