Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 29;19(9):2010. doi: 10.3390/s19092010

Table 5.

Comparison of simulation and experimental results with the actual damage location and size.

Detection Size
d (mm)
Detection Method Error in Experimental Results (%) Error in Numerical Results (%)
Location Size Location Size
240 Single-stage 15.28 128.56 3.33 68.92
Two-stage 5.13 56.64 2.98 22.67
Three-stage 3.16 24.20 0 2.66
300 Single-stage 12.58 107.3 3.16 69.33
Two-stage 5.17 43.41 2.87 17.53
Three-stage 2.94 18.66 0 2.34