Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 30;16(9):1539. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091539

Table 4.

Comparison of the indirect effects of preparation behaviors (T1) through motivational resource losses (T2) and gains (T2) in the prediction of quality of life (T3).

Criterion Variable: Quality of life (T3) B Boot Boot Boot
Indirect Effects of Preparation Behaviors (T1) SE LLCI ULCI
Total: 0.24 0.04 0.16 0.34
Ind1: Preparation behavior (T1) lost resources motivational (T2)
→ Quality of life (T3)
0.24 0.04 0.17 0.34
Ind2: Preparation behavior (T1) lost resources motivational (T2)
→ earnings resources motivational (T2) → Quality of life (T3)
−0.00 0.00 −0.01 0.00
Ind3: Preparation behavior (T1) earnings resources motivational (T2)
→ Quality of life (T3)
0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.01
(C1) Ind1 Less Ind2 0.24 0.04 0.16 0.34
(C2) Ind1 Less Ind3 0.24 0.04 0.16 0.34
(C3) Ind2 Less Ind3 −0.00 0.01 −0.01 0.01

T1 = Time 1; T2 = Time 2; T3 = Time 3; Ind = Indirect Effect. LLCI = lower level of the Confidence interval of 95%. ULCI = Upper level of the Confidence interval of 95%. SE = Standard Error. Indirect effects are significant when the interval does not contain the zero.