Table 2.

P-values from two-tailed t-tests to assess the statistical significance of differences in the shape distributions (c, circles; e, ellipses; u, U-shapes) of (i) CS-EYFP-GABARAP vs. CS-EYFP-LC3B (various size classes), (ii) different size classes of CS-EYFP-GABARAP, (iii) different size classes of CS-EYFP-LC3B, and (iv) CS-EYFP-GABARAP or CS-EYFP-LC3B structures classified in wide-field vs. SMLM. P-values are indicated by shading and typeface (≤0.01, dark grey and bold face; ≤0.05, medium grey and bold face; ≤0.1, no shading and regular face) for ease of orientation.

	c	e	u
CS-EYFP-GABARAP vs. CS-EYFP-LC3B (50 nm–2.8 μm)	0.0026	0.00050	0.21
CS-EYFP-GABARAP vs. CS-EYFP-LC3B (< 100 nm)	0.010	0.0053	0.66
CS-EYFP-GABARAP vs. CS-EYFP-LC3B (> 100 nm)	0.000026	0.019	0.10
CS-EYFP-GABARAP vs. CS-EYFP-LC3B (< 300 nm)	0.0024	0.00035	0.29
CS-EYFP-GABARAP vs. CS-EYFP-LC3B (> 300 nm)	0.000023	0.49	0.04
CS-EYFP-GABARAP: CS < 100 nm vs. CS > 100 nm	0.29	0.54	0.20
CS-EYFP-GABARAP: CS < 300 nm vs. CS > 300 nm	0.0042	0.02	0.23
CS-EYFP-LC3B: CS < 100 nm vs. CS > 100 nm	0.09	0.71	0.04
CS-EYFP-LC3B: CS < 300 nm vs. CS > 300 nm	0.03	0.08	0.02
CS-EYFP-GABARAP: WF vs. SMLM	0.000010	0.50	0.0018
CS-EYFP-LC3B:WF vs. SMLM	0.000010	0.70	0.01