Table 3.
Condom Availability Program Outcome Evaluation Findings: STIs, Pregnancy, Condom Use, and Contraception Use
| Program | STIs | Pregnancy | Condom use at last sex | Current condom use | Past year 100% condom use | Contraception use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Unified School District | NA | NA | Not Significant | NA | NA | NA |
| Los Angeles County | NA | NA | NA | NA | Positive | NA |
| Adams City | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Massachusetts | NA | Not Significant | Positive | NA | NA | Mixeda |
| Holyoke | Negative | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| New York City Schools | NA | NA | Positive | NA | NA | NA |
| School District of Philadelphia | NA | NA | Not Significant | Not Significant | NA | NA |
| Seattle Public School District | NA | NA | Negative | NA | NA | Positive |
| Synthesis | NA | NA | Mixed | NA | NA | Mixed |
*
Positive means CAPs are significantly positively associated with the outcome. Negative means CAPs are significantly negatively associated with the outcome. NA means the outcome was not assessed. The p-value for significant findings is less than .05.
a
This program found both positive and negative associations with different measures of contraception use.