Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 24;5(1):e000534. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000534

Table 2.

Comparison of participants who attained cardiovascular (CVS) (n=95) and both CVS and strength (n=34) recommendations compared with those who did not

Characteristic Attained CVS
(n=95)
Did not attain CVS
(n=237)
P value Attained CVS and strength
(n=34)
Did not attain CVS and strength
(n=298)
P value
Specialty 0.265 0.756
 Anaesthetics 32 (33.7) 76 (32.1) 12 (35.3) 96 (32.2)
 ED 13 (13.7) 17 (7.2) 6 (17.6) 24 (8.1)
 Laboratory 8 (8.4) 23 (9.7) 3 (8.8) 28 (9.4)
 Medicine 18 (18.9) 40 (16.8) 4 (11.8) 54 (18.1)
 Surgery 24 (25.3) 81 (34.2) 9 (26.5) 96 (32.2)
Grade 0.220 0.677
 ST3-4 13 (13.7) 30 (12.7) 6 (17.6) 37 (12.4)
 ST5-8 16 (16.8) 61 (25.7) 7 (20.6) 70 (23.5)
 Consultant 66 (69.5) 146 (61.6) 21 (61.8) 191 (64.1)
Aware of guidelines 43 (45.3) 75 (31.6) 0.019 19 (55.9) 99 (33.2) 0.009
Organised activity 48 (50.5) 48 (20.3) <0.001 23 (67.6) 73 (24.5) <0.001
Competitive activity 44 (46.3) 43 (18.1) <0.001 18 (52.9) 69 (23.2) <0.001
CVS exercise, hours (total) 7 (6–10) 3 (1.5–5) <0.001 7 (6–10) 4 (2–6) <0.001

Data presented as number (percentage) and median (IQR).

ED, emergency department; ST, specialty trainee.