Skip to main content
. 2019 May 6;18(1):35–42. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10316

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Ratio of IFNγ/IL-4. At T1, there was no significant difference in IFNγ/IL-4 ratio among the three groups (P>0.05). At T2, IFNγ/IL-4 ratios were significantly higher in all three groups compared with T1 (*P<0.05). At T2, there was no significant difference in IFNγ/IL-4 ratio between groups A and B, or between groups B and C (P>0.05), whereas the IFNγ/IL-4 ratio in group C was higher than that in group A (#P<0.05).