Summary of findings 1. Naproxen 500 mg or 825 mg compared with placebo for migraine headache.
Naproxen 500 mg or 825 mg compared with placebo for migraine headache | ||||||
Patient or population: migraine headache ‐ moderate or severe pain Settings: community Intervention: naproxen 500 mg or 825 mg Comparison: placebo | ||||||
Outcomes | Probable outcome with comparator | Probable outcome with intervention | NNT or NNH and/or relative effect (95% CI) | No of studies, attacks, events | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments |
Pain‐free response at 2 h | 80 in 1000 | 170 in 1000 | NNT 11 (8.7 to 17) | 4 studies, 2149 attacks, 275 events | Moderate1 | Lower NNTs are better than higher NNTs |
Headache relief at 2 h | 290 in 1000 | 450 in 1000 | NNT 6.0 (4.8 to 7.9) | 4 studies, 2149 attacks, 793 events | Moderate1 | Lower NNTs are better than higher NNTs |
Sustained pain‐free during the 24 h post dose | 70 in 1000 | 120 in 1000 | NNT 19 (13 to 34) | 4 studies, 2149 attacks, 202 events | Moderate1 | Lower NNTs are better than higher NNTs |
Sustained headache relief during the 24 h post dose | 180 in 1000 | 300 in 1000 | NNT 8.3 (6.4 to 12) | 4 studies, 2149 attacks, 505 events | Moderate1 | Lower NNTs are better than higher NNTs |
At least one AE | 120 in 1000 | 150 in 1000 | NNH 28 (15 to 130) | 4 studies, 2174 attacks, 293 events | Low2 | Higher NNHs are better than lower NNTs |
Serious AE | Insufficient data | ‐ | ||||
AE: adverse event; CI: confidence interval; NNT: number needed to treat; NNH: number needed to harm. Note: NNT or NNH is reported when an outcome is statistically different from placebo or comparator. Where the result is not statistically different, a risk ratio or similar outcome is reported. | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate. |
1 ‐ Quality of evidence downgraded from high because of threat from potential publication bias with modest effect size and numbers of events.
2 ‐ Quality of evidence downgraded from high because of threat from potential publication bias with modest effect size and numbers of events, combined with inconsistent reporting of the outcome.