. 2019 May 29;20:258. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2632-y

Table 1.

Demographic data of the included patient cohort

		CT [n / %]	No CT [n / %]	Pearsonsχ² [Value / df]	p-value
Total		45 / 60.0	30 / 40.0
Gender	Female	28 / 62.2	22 / 73.3	1.000 / 1	0.454
Gender	Male	17 / 37.8	8 / 26.7	1.000 / 1	0.454
Cement	No	19 / 42.2	10 / 34.5	0.443 / 1	0.627
Cement	Yes	26 / 57.8	19 / 65.5	0.443 / 1	0.627
Prosthesis	Hemi-Prosthesis	2 / 4.4	2 / 6.7	0.919 / 2	1.000
	Full- Prosthesis	41 / 91.1	27 / 90.0
	Revision-Prosthesis	2 / 4.4	1 / 3.3
ASA	1	1 / 2.9	–	4.827 / 3	0.141
	2	12 / 34.3	11 / 45.8
	3	22 / 62.9	11 / 45.8
	4	–	2 / 8.3
Operative Strategy	Cerclage	–	2 / 6.7	6.838 / 3	0.056
	Plate Fixation	21 / 53.8	18 / 60.0
	Exchange	20 / 44.4	10 / 33.3
	Intramedullary Nail	4 / 8.9	–
Intraoperative	Fixed	24 / 54.5	17 / 58.6	0.118 / 1	0.812
Intraoperative	Loose	20 / 45.5	12 / 41.4	0.118 / 1	0.812

Numbers (n) and percentage (%) are presented in the right column