Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 26;92(1096):20180383. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180383

Table 3.

Median and ranges of differences between the original pCT and the CBCT DVHs for primary (PTV70) and nodal (PTV56) planning target volumes, together with spinal cord and brain stem as OARs (head and neck patients)

Target
& OAR
Constraint Standard pCT
calibration curve
CBCT site-specific
calibration curve
HU density
override
Deformable
registration
Median difference
(min; max)
Median difference
(min; max)
Median difference
(min;max)
Median difference
PTV70 Dose to 99% −0.4 −0.1 0.1 0.0
of the volume [%] (−0.8; 0.3) (−0.2; 0.5) (0.0; 0.3) (−0.2; 0.2)
Dose to 95% −0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0
of the volume [%] (−0.6; 0.4) (−0.2; 0.7) (0.0; 0.3) (0.0; 0.4)
Max dose to 1% 0.1 0.7 0.4 0.1
of the volume [%] (−0.1; 1.0) (0.2; 1.3) (0.3; 1.0) (0.0; 0.9)
PTV56 Dose to 99% −1.3 −1.5 −1.2 −2.0
of the volume [%] (−5.4; −0.9) (−3.9; −0.3) (−3.2; −0.1) (−2.7; −0.2)
Dose to 95% −0.2 0.0 −0.2 −0.4
of the volume [%] (−1.1; 0.0) (0.5; 0.3) (−0.3; 0.3) (−0.5; −0.1)
Max dose to 1% 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2
of the volume [%] (−0.2; 0.7) (0.1; 1.3) (0.3; 0.7) (0.0; 0.7)
Spinal cord Dose to 0.1 cm3 −0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
of volume [Gy] (−0.4; 0.1) (−0.1; 0.2) (−0.1; 0.1) (0.0; 0.1)
Brain stem Dose to 0.1 cm3 −0.1 0.2 0.2 −0.1
of the volume [Gy] (−0.2; 0.4) (0.1; 0.5) (0.0; 0.3) (−0.3; 0.1)

CBCT, cone beam CT; DVH, dose volume histogram; HU, Hounsfield unit; OAR, organ at risk; PTV, planning target volume.