Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jan 10;276(2):473–482. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5247-2

Table 3.

Within-group comparisons of aerodynamic parameters between different elongation levels.

Dependent Variables Elongation Levels (%) Experimental Condition Control Condition
Diff of Means P Diff of Means P
PTP (cmH2O) 20 vs. 0 2.751 <0.001* 3.268 <0.001*
20 vs. 10 1.173 0.001* 1.717 <0.001*
10 vs. 0 1.578 <0.001* 1.55 <0.001*
PTF (mL/s) 20 vs. 0 52.843 <0.001* 88.442 <0.001*
20 vs. 10 15.519 0.437 42.493 0.004*
10 vs. 0 37.324 0.012* 45.95 0.002*
PIP (cmH2O) 20 vs. 0 1.276 0.249 1.316 0.229
20 vs. 10 0.777 0.593 1.209 0.287
10 vs. 0 0.5 0.805 0.107 0.99
PIF (mL/s) 20 vs. 0 0.681 1.000 33.887 0.269
20 vs. 10 19.796 0.633 14.987 0.769
10 vs. 0 20.477 0.614 18.9 0.659
PPR (cmH2O) 20 vs. 0 1.474 0.165 1.951 0.046*
20 vs. 10 0.396 0.875 0.508 0.803
10 vs. 0 1.078 0.376 1.443 0.178
PFR (mL/s) 20 vs. 0 52.162 0.039* 54.555 0.029*
20 vs. 10 35.314 0.215 27.506 0.389
10 vs. 0 16.848 0.699 27.049 0.401

Note: comparisons with significant results are denoted with an asterisk