Skip to main content
. 2019 May 29;14(5):e0215847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215847

Table 3. PET and FAT analysis (using WTP in $/lb).

WLS with robust SEs WLS with cluster robust SEs Wild bootstrap cluster robust SEs
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Coeff. CI Coeff. CI Coeff. CI Coeff. CI Coeff. CI Coeff. CI
Constant 2.076*** (0.313) 1.454; 2.698 1.696*** (0.222) 1.253; 2.139 2.076*** (0.454) 1.154; 2.999 1.696*** (0.322) 1.042; 2.350 2.076*** [0.000] 1.225; 2.945 1.696*** [0.000] 1.094; 2.295
sqrt(n) -0.035*** (0.008) -0.051; -0.019 -0.035*** (0.012) -0.060; -0.011 -0.035** [0.020] -0.060; -0.012
n -0.001*** (0.000) -0.001; -0.000 -0.001*** (0.000) -0.001; -0.000 -0.001*** [0.002] -0.001; -0.000
obs 86 86 86 86 86 86
F 18.610 27.120 8.470 13.300
Prob >F 0.000 0.000 0.006 0.001
R2 0.083 0.108 0.083 0.108 0.083 0.108
Adj, R2 0.072 0.097 0.072 0.097 0.072 0.097

Note: Dependent variable is WTP for local; Standard errors in parentheses; p-values in brackets. CI refers to 95% confidence interval

***, **, * indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10%-level, respectively. sqrt(n) is used as weight.