. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2018 Oct 11;10(1):80–94. doi: 10.1007/s13239-018-00382-2

Table 1.

Hydrodynamic performance assessment comparison.

	Transvalvular Pressure (mmHg)	Effective Orifice Area (cm²)	Regurgitant Fraction (%)
Bioreactor	7.4±0.5	0.78±0.05	0.1±0.3
ViVitro Pulse Duplicator	4.0±0.2	0.81±0.04	6.3±1.2

Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation.