Skip to main content
. 2019 May 29;10(3):358–366. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688831

Table 4. On-treatment analysis: Care plan concordance.

Outcome Unadjusted analysis Adjusted analysis b
Pre, n  = 55 Post, portal users, n  = 27 p -Value Pre, n  = 55 Post, portal users, n  = 27 p -Value b
Mean concordance score for overall care plan (0–100) 62.2 70.0 0.02 61.9 70.1 < 0.01
Mean concordance scores for individual care plan elements (0–100)
 Haberle recovery goal a 31.1 66.7 < 0.01 30.4 66.8 < 0.01
 Main reason for hospitalization 59.0 81.1 < 0.01 58.3 81.7 < 0.01
 Tests scheduled 53.8 44.3 0.31 53.5 45.8 0.45
 Procedures scheduled 70.8 68.2 0.81 70.2 68.9 0.91
 Medications changed 49.1 54.9 0.52 49.0 53.7 0.61
 Consults planned 53.3 58.8 0.58 51.3 59.5 0.43
 Time of discharge 94.7 97.6 0.37 95.5 95.5 1.00
 Discussion with patient or clinician 87.3 79.8 0.30 88.5 79.2 0.14

Note: The mean concordance score for overall care plan is an average of individual concordance scores across each of the eight care plan elements: Haberle recovery goal, main reason for hospitalization, tests scheduled, procedures scheduled, medications changed, consults planned, time of discharge, and discussion with patient or clinician. p -values in bold are statistically significant.

a

The choices for the Haberle recovery goal are: “be cured,” “live longer,” “improve health or maintain health,” “be comfortable,” “accomplish a particular life goal,” or “other.”

b

Adjusted for care unit length of stay.