Table 2.
Associations between mean activation in R NAcc and Putamen and reward-related ESM measures (controlled for age and gender, and the ESM analyses also for overall time of measurement, time of measurement within the day)
| L NAcc | L Putamen | R NAcc | R Putamen | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symptom measure | beta (se) | P | beta (se) | P | beta (se) | P | beta (se) | P | ||||
| MADRS | −.003 (.009) | .750 | −.001 (.008) | .816 | −.011 (.010) | .268 | −.009 (.008) | .267 | ||||
| IDS-SR | −.012 (.006) | .037 | −.007 (.005) | .177 | −.017 (.006) | .010* | −.013 (.005) | .009* | ||||
| beta(seML) - | beta(seML) - | beta(seML) - | beta(seML) - | |||||||||
| ESM measure | (serob) | pML | prob | (serob) | pML | prob | (serob) | pML | prob | (serob) | pML | prob |
| .039 (.153) - | .799 | .832 | −.095 (.177) - | .594 | .550 | .107 (.143) - | .453 | .547 | .128 (.170) - | .451 | .421 | |
| Reward anticipation | (.183) | (.158) | (178) | (159) | ||||||||
| .070 (.107) - | .512 | .548 | .015 (.124) - | .903 | .905 | .114 (.100) - | .254 | .315 | .188 (.118) - | .110 | .076 | |
| Activity pleasantness | (.117) | (.127) | (.114) | (.106) | ||||||||
| .031 (.012) - | .010* | .016* | .019 (.015) - | .205 | .257 | .026 (.010) - | .011* | .016* | .047 (.012) - | <.001* | .001* | |
| qua (.013) | (.017) | (011) | (015) | |||||||||
| Activity pleasantness (t) | .025 (.026) - | .326 | .340 | .009 (.030) - | .753 | .773 | .033 (.022) - | .138 | .166 | .004 (.028) - | .876 | .900 |
| ←Reward anticipation (t-1) lin (.026) | (.033) | (.024) | (.035) | |||||||||
Note. All ESM predictors were person-mean-centered. Models with time-varying predictors include random slopes of those predictors (incl. quadratic variables). Models with lagged predictors include the lagged outcome as a predictor. Abbreviations: L=left, R=right, NAcc=Nuccleus Accumbens, MADRS= Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale, IDS-SR=Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report, se=standard error, p=p-value, seML= standard error estimated using standard log likelihood procedure, serob=standard error estimated using the robust Huber-White sandwich estimation procedure, pML=p-value of effect based on the log-likelihood standard error estimation, prob=p-value of effect based on robust Huber-White sandwich estimation, qua=quadratic (referring to time-lagged quadratic effect of reward anticipation on activity pleasantness, lin=linear (referring to time-lagged linear effect of reward anticipation on activity pleasantness).
indicates a significant p-value after correction for multiple testing following the Holm method (Aickin and Gensler, 1996, Holm, 1979), correction performed within each row of the table.