Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 13;27(6):1825–1839. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05504-4

Table 6.

Quality of life in MAT studies

Outcomes, mean (SD) Kempshall et al. [22]a Cole et al. [13] Marcacci [28] Rue [42] Abrams et al. [3] Riboh [38]
Chondral surface good n = 60 Chondral surface bare n = 39 n = 36 n = 32 n = 28 n = 32
KOOS QoL
 Baseline value 28.9 (5.0) 22.4 (5.0) 26b 25.2 (18.9)
 Endpoint value 52.7 (7.1) 45.0 (8.1) 50b 55.1 (20.4)
 p value p < 0.001 p < 0.001 p = 0.16 <0.001
SF-12/36 physical SF-36 SF-36 SF-12
 Baseline value 40b 37.3 (7.2) 38.9 (7.3) 38.6 (6.6)
 Endpoint value 48b 49.7 (8.3) 44.0 (5.5) 46.6 (6.8)
 p value p < 0.05 p < 0.0001 0.001
SF-12/36 mental SF-36 SF-36 SF-12 SF12
 Baseline value 50b 49.7 (10.8) 55.5 (9.4) 54.0 (11.7)
 Endpoint value 55b 53.5 (7.5) 55.2 (8.2) 55.8 (8.0)
 Change value NR NR p < 0.34
 p value p = ns p = 0.0032
SF-12 overall
 Baseline value 43.5 (5.6)
 Endpoint value 46.6 (5.9)
 p value 0.041

aOutcomes assessed at 2 years, not mean follow-up of 2.9 years, results described as mean (95% CI)

bEstimated from figure