Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 22;27(6):1810–1816. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05477-4

Table 2.

Lysholm knee score, PCL reconstruction

Lysholm Knee score at final endpoint, mean (SD) unless stated P value
Ahn [1] unclear ROB Allograft group n = 18 Autograft group n = 18  < 0.01
Baseline 68.6 68.2
Change at endpoint + 17.2 + 21.9
Li [13] Unclear ROB Single-bundle allograft, n = 22 Double-bundle allograft, n = 24
Baseline value 63.1 (3.8) 64.6 (4.3) NA
Endpoint value 88.0 (4.2) 89.8 (3.8)
P value < 0.05a < 0.05a
Wang [23] high ROB Allograft group, n = 23 Autograft, n = 32
Endpoint value 92.3 (6.8) 87.8 (9.6) n.s
Yoon [26] unclear ROB Single-bundle allograft, n = 25 Double-bundle allograft, n = 28
Median (range)
 Baseline value 64 (41–73) 62 (43–71) NA
 Endpoint value 89 (71–99) 91 (76–100)
 P value < 0.001 < 0.001
Min [15] poor quality Allograft, n = 21
Mean (range)
 Baseline value 52.2 (42–66)b
 Endpoint value 78 (56–92)b
 P value < 0.001
Lim [14] fair quality Allograft, n = 22
Median (range)
 Baseline value 64 (50–75)
 Endpoint value 88 (82–96)
 P value < 0.001
Yoon [27] poor quality Allograft, n = 26
Baseline value 59.5
Endpoint value 91.8
P value < 0.05

aP value between baseline and 24 months after surgery, data presented are for final follow-up

bRates different in the abstract, which were 53 (SD 5.3), range 34–68 pre-operatively and 83.5 (SD 13), range 61–97 at follow-up of mean 49.2 months (range 25–73). ROB risk of bias