Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 29;36(5):925–933. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01420-1

Table 4.

Logistic regression and linear regression analysis results presenting adjusted odds ratios for the main potential confounders representing outcomes achieved in AC-FET with respect to the NC-LPS group

Unadjusted (95% CI) Adjusted (95% CI) Adjusted P value
Logistic regression for clinical outcomes
 Clinical pregnancy ratea 0.815 (0.746, 0.890) 0.976 (0.874, 1.089) 0.661
 Miscarriage ratea 1.248 (1.066, 1.462) 1.172 (0.968, 1.418) 0.104
 Ectopic pregnancy ratea 2.120 (1.454, 3.092) 1.738 (1.086, 2.781) 0.021
 Live birth ratea 0.718 (0.619, 0.832) 0.709 (0.626–0.802) < 0.001
 Multiple birth ratea 0.792 (0.674, 0.930) 1.655 (0.915, 2.995) 0.096
Logistic regression for obstetric outcomes
 Hypertensive disorderb 1.782 (1.341, 2.367) 1.858 (1.383, 2.497) < 0.001
 Caesarean sectionc 1.681 (1.386, 2.038) 1.668 (1.365, 2.038) < 0.001

Regression coefficients (95% CI) associated with the use of NC-LPS group (NC-LPS group = 0 and AC-FET group = 1)

a. Adjusted for BMI, endometrial thickness (mm) on translate day, basal FSH level (miu/ml), blastomere or blastocyst transfer between AC-FET and NC-LPS groups

b. Adjusted for BMI, endometrial thickness (mm) on translate day, basal FSH level (miu/ml), blastomere or blastocyst transfer, singletons or multiples, the day of development of frozen embryos of the two groups

c. Adjusted for BMI, endometrial thickness (mm) on translate day, basal FSH level (miu/ml), blastomere or blastocyst transfer, the day of development of frozen embryos, singletons or multiples and the incidence of hypertension disorder of the two groups