Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 1;104(3):685–693. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.003

Table 2.

Pairwise interobserver contour agreement and confidence from Experienced observer cohort (3 observers)

DSC MCCD (mm) Observer rating
CBCT 0.82 (0.13) 2.94 (1.58) 4 (4)
US 0.81 (0.14) 2.25 (2.67) 7 (3)
CBCT-US fusion 0.87 (0.07) 1.63 (0.63) 8 (2)

Abbreviations: CBCT = cone beam computed tomography; DSC = Dice similarity coefficient; MCCD = mean contour-to-contour distance; US = ultrasound.

Median and interquartile range results from the pairwise analysis from the 3 observers in the Experienced cohort for (column 1) the DSC, (column 2) the MCCD, and (column 3) observer ratings of contour confidence (1 = extremely unconfident and 10 = extremely confident). Symbols indicate significant differences (P < .005) between imaging modalities within a column.

Significant difference between CBCT and US.

CBCT-US fusion is significantly different from both CBCT and US.