Table 3. Signals detected by prospective SaTScan analysis.
State | Signals | Median recurrence interval (range)1 | Median cases (range) | Median Cluster radius (km,range) | # of health department clusters detected |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CA | |||||
p<0.05 | 0 | - | - | - | 0 |
p<0.01 | 0 | - | - | - | 0 |
CO | |||||
p<0.05 | 3 | 100 (21–100) | 4 (3–5) | 5.76 (4.99–5.77) | 0 |
p<0.01 | 0 | - | - | - | 0 |
CT | |||||
p<0.05 | 4 | 40 (32–53) | 3 (2–5) | 4.69 (0–5.51) | 0 |
p<0.01 | 0 | - | - | - | 0 |
GA | |||||
p<0.05 | 2 | 53 (29–77) | 3 | 5.56 (5.87–5.24) | 0 |
p<0.01 | 0 | - | - | - | 0 |
MD | |||||
p<0.05 | 15 | 81 (22–880) | 4 (3–6) | 4.28 (1.03–5.86) | 0 |
p<0.01 | 6 | 145 (104–880) | 5 (3–6) | 4.05 (3.09–5.78) | 0 |
MN | |||||
p<0.05 | 4 | 28 (23–91) | 3 (2–3) | 5.13 (1.66–5.76) | 0 |
p<0.01 | 0 | - | - | - | 0 |
NM | |||||
p<0.05 | 0 | - | - | - | - |
p<0.01 | 0 | - | - | - | 0 |
NY | |||||
p<0.05 | 4 | 44 (28–100) | 6 (3–14) | 4.86 (1.54–5.99) | 0 |
p<0.01 | 0 | - | - | - | 0 |
OR | |||||
p<0.05 | 2 | 101 (21–180) | 3 (2–3) | 4.78 (4.30–5.26) | 0 |
p<0.01 | 1 | 180 | 3 | 4.30 | 0 |
TN | |||||
p<0.05 | 5 | 37 (26–91) | 3 (2–4) | 3.93 (3.53–5.13) | 0 |
p<0.01 | 0 | - | - | - | 0 |
1Reccurence interval varies inversely with the p-value and represents the number of surveillance days required to detect a similarly significant signal by chance