Table 3. Potential amino acid substitutions detected in the samples analysed in this study, compared to the reference Hic74 sequence [Hyriopsis cumingii].
Positions are derived from the sequence alignment shown in Figure 6. Dashes indicate that the position was not covered for that sample; question mark symbols indicate ambiguous substitutions. Hic74 coverages for each sample and supporting product ion spectra are presented in Figure 6—figure supplement 1, Figure 6—figure supplement 2, Figure 6—figure supplement 3, Figure 6—figure supplement 4, Figure 6—figure supplement 5, Figure 6—figure supplement 6, Figure 6—figure supplement 7, Figure 6—figure supplement 8, Figure 6—figure supplement 9, Figure 6—figure supplement 10, as well as in Figure 6—source data 1.
| Hic74 [Hyriopsis cumingii] | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | G | D | G | S | E | G | A | A | L | V | G | L | I | A | G | A | Q | R | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA position | 83 | 85 | 91 | 93 | 106 | 108 | 110 | 111 | 151 | 152 | 163 | 172 | 175 | 282 | 283 | 284 | 289 | 292 | 306 | 310 | 403 | 801 | 804 | 821 | 822 | 827 |
| U. crassus | - | - | A | A | A | A | A | G | D | G | - | Q | G | A | ? | L | ? | G | L | F | A | - | - | Q | R | E |
| U. pictorum | - | - | ? | ? | ? | - | - | - | - | - | - | Q | G | - | - | - | - | - | L | F | ? | S | S | Q | R | E |
| M. margaritifera | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Q | G | - | A | L | L | G | L | F | A | - | - | Q | R | E |
| P. auricularius | - | A | A | A | A | A | A | - | ? | ? | D | E | L | - | A | F | V | E | F | I | - | - | - | H | H | D |
| HavA | A | S | A | A | A | ? | ? | A | - | - | - | Q | G | A | A | L | L | G | L | F | - | - | - | Q | G | E |
| HavB | ? | S | A | A | A | V | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | L | L | G | L | F | - | - | - | Q | G | E |
| HavC | ? | S | A | A | A | V | ? | A | D | G | G | - | G | ? | A | L | L | G | L | F | - | G | S | Q | G | E |