Table 1.

Safety Check Use and Acceptability for PCPs and CLs^a

	PCPs (n = 103)					Leaders (n = 40)
	Frequency of PCP-reported Intervention Use					Frequency of CL-reported PCP Intervention Use a
	Never	Rarely	Sometimes	Most of the Time	Always	Never	Rarely	Sometimes	Most of the Time	Always
Screening	11 (10%)	29 (28%)	29 (28%)	20 (19%)	10 (9%)	3 (1%)	8 (20%)	17 (43%)	10 (25%)	0 (0%)
Counseling	15 (15%)	20 (19%)	34 (33%)	23 (22%)	6 (6%)	8 (20%)	8 (20%)	15 (38%)	7 (18%)	0 (0%)
Firearm Locks	88 (85%)	6 (6%)	1 (1%)	2 (2%)	0 (0%)	35 (88%)	1 (.03%)	1 (.03%)	1 (.03%)	0 (0%)

	PCP Acceptability b				Leader Acceptability b
	High Risk Youthc M (SD)	General youth M (SD)	Point estimate of the difference M [95% CI]	Test Statistic (df)	High Risk Youthb M (SD)	Genera l youth M (SD)	Point estimate of the difference M [95% CI]	Test Statistic (df)
Screening	5.40 (.76)	4.30 (1.10)	1.10 [1.34, .85]	t (96) = 8.82**	5.46 (.80)	4.13 (.96)	1.32 [1.69, .96]	t (36) = 7.45**
Counseling	5.39 (.76)	4.56 (.89)	.84 [1.02, .65]	t (96) = 8.81**	5.51 (.61)	4.21 (.87)	1.31 [1.61, .99]	t (36) = 8.54**
Firearm Locks	4.65 (1.42)	4.66 (1.42)	.89 [1.10, .6]	t (96) = 8.15**	4.92 (1.23)	3.70 (1.14)	1.22 [1.49, .94]	t (36) = 8.99**

Note. PCP = primary care physician.

^*p < .05 =

^**p < .001 = . 4 PCPs did no report on screening practices, 5 PCPs did not report on counseling practices, 6 PCPs did not report on firearm lock provision practice. 2 leaders did not report on their PCPs practices related screening, counseling, or firearm provision.

^aLeaders reported on the rates of screening, counseling and firearm lock provision amongst the PCPs in their practice

^bAcceptability was measured using a 6 point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 6 = Strongly Agree); higher scores indicated higher acceptability.

^cHigh-risk youth are those considered at risk for suicide