Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 27;30(4):e60. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e60

Table 2. Characteristics associated with patients undergoing RRBSO.

Characteristics No RRBSO (n=154) RRBSO (n=44) p-value
Age at testing, Median (Range) 46 (26–79) 47.5 (30–67)
Variant type 0.603
Negative 80 (52) 19 (43)
Unknown 59 (38) 20 (46)
Favor polymorphism 14 (9) 4 (9)
Suspect deleterious 1 (1) 1 (2)
Race 0.095
Non-caucasian 98 (64) 20 (46)
Caucasian 42 (27) 18 (41)
Not reported 14 (9) 6 (14)
Ethnicity 0.023
Ashkenazi 88 (57) 30 (68)
Non-Ashkenazi 44 (29) 4 (9)
Not reported 22 (14) 10 (23)
Parity 0.403
0 56 (36) 13 (30)
≥1 98 (64) 31 (71)
Menopausal status 0.216
Premenopausal 99 (64) 23 (52)
Perimenopausal 10 (7) 4 (9)
Postmenopausal 40 (26) 17 (39)
Unknown 5 (3) 0 (0)
OCPs prior to RRBSO 0.520
Yes 77 (50) 18 (41)
No 35 (23) 13 (30)
Unknown 42 (27) 13 (30)
Personal history of breast cancer* 117 (76) 36 (82) 0.415
Personal history of gynecologic cancer* 3 (1) 1 (2) 1.000
Family history of breast cancer* 100 (67) 29 (67) 0.924
Family history of all gynecologic cancers* 26 (17.3) 12 (28) 0.124
Family history of ovarian cancer* 20 (13) 11 (25) 0.053

Values are presented as number (%).

Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for small cells for categorical variables, and t-tests for continuous variables. For family history, patients with unknown family histories were excluded.

RRBSO, risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; OCP, oral contraceptive pills.

*Patients with unknown cancer history were excluded from this analysis.