Skip to main content
. 2019 May 27;3(2):122–130. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.04.004

Table 3.

CAC Levels According to FAC Ranked Categoriesa

Characteristic FAC (% predicted)
P valuec
≤69
70-99
100-129
≥130
No.b Median (IQR) No.b Median (IQR) No.b Median (IQR) No.b Median (IQR)
Overall 131 21 (1-125) 1314 4 (0-60) 1329 2 (0-59) 172 18 (0-129) <.001d,e,f,g
Age group (y)
 ≤49 45 3 (0-29) 560 0 (0-7) 444 0 (0-5) 40 0 (0-36) .002d,e
 50-59 60 21 (1-165) 576 8.5 (0-83.5) 637 4 (0-59) 82 15.5 (0-128) .002f,h
 ≥60 26 83.5 (9-298) 178 82.5 (12-306) 248 59 (3.5-243.5) 50 69 (1-281) .58
Family history of premature CAD
 No 89 21 (0-88) 950 3 (0-59) 946 1.4 (0-54) 107 13 (0-100) .001d,e,g
 Yes 37 10 (0-158) 345 6 (0-66) 359 6 (0-77) 63 34 (0-270) .11
a

CAC = coronary artery calcium; CAD = coronary artery disease; FAC = functional aerobic capacity; IQR = interquartile range.

b

Number of patients with information available.

c

CAC was compared across FAC groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test. If the overall comparison across groups was statistically significant, supplemental pairwise group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

d

P<.05 for pairwise comparison of ≤69% vs 70%-99%.

e

P<.05 for pairwise comparison of ≤69% vs 100%-129%.

f

P<.05 for pairwise comparison of 70%-99% vs ≥130%.

g

P<.05 for pairwise comparison of 100%-129% vs ≥130%.

h

P<.05 for pairwise comparison of 70%-99% vs 100%-129%.