Table 1.
Dilution set (wells) | Skew | Kurtosis | Total data points |
---|---|---|---|
A1–6 | 1.064 | 7.357 | 237 |
B1–6 | 0.615 | 4.085 | 237 |
C1–6 | 0.221 | 3.556 | 244 |
D1–6 | 1.051 | 6.305 | 241 |
E1–6 | 0.473 | 5.524 | 240 |
F1–6 | 1.88 | 6.769 | 222 |
G1–6 | 2.012 | 10.079 | 220 |
H1–6 | 1.379 | 12.177 | 223 |
A7–12 | −0.337 | 2.16 | 220 |
B7–12 | 0.098 | 4.508 | 217 |
C7–12 | 0.215 | 2.838 | 259 |
D7–12 | 0.739 | 2.514 | 241 |
E7–12 | 0.563 | 3.555 | 223 |
F7–12 | −0.034 | 3.843 | 206 |
G7–12 | 1.429 | 7.023 | 198 |
H7–12 | −0.148 | 5.319 | 240 |
Pairwise E values of 16 dilution sets were analyzed for skewness and kurtosis. Skewness values that deviate from 0 indicate asymmetry of the distribution, making it a non-normal distribution. Positive kurtosis values also imply deviation from normal distribution and indicate that the distribution is sharp (more values are close to mathematical expectation, and precision is higher than would be expected in the case of normal distribution). The right column contains the numbers of individual pairwise E determinations for each dilution set that were taken for this analysis