Skip to main content
. 2019 May 31;17:103. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1334-5

Table 5.

Prevalence of disease on microscopy (upper part of the table) and qPCR (lower part of the table), N (%, 95% CI) *McNemar to compare sensitivity and specificity present ratio of proportions. All ratios presented as XN-30 relative to HRP-2 and pLDH respectively

XN-30 and RDT (HRP-2 and pLDH) versus corrected microscopy results (n = 837)
XN-30 HRP-2 Test ratio p value pLDH Test ratio p value
Pos Neg Pos Neg 95% CI Pos Neg 95% CI
Microscopy positive 234 3 231 6 208 29
Microscopy negative 21 579 136 464 9 591
Sensitivity 98.7% 97.5% 0.99 (0.97–1.01) p = .45 87.8% 0.89 (0.85–0.93) p < .0001
Specificity 96.5% 77.3% 6.47 (4.31–9.73) p < .0001 98.5% 0.43 (0.23–0.81) p = .012
PPV 91.8% 62.9% 95.9%
NPV 99.5% 98.7% 95.3%
XN-30 and RDT (HRP-2 and pLDH) versus qPCR results (n = 837)
XN-30 HRP-2 Test ratio p value pLDH Test ratio p value
Pos Neg Pos Neg 95% CI Pos Neg 95% CI
qPCR > 0.05 p/μL 253 104 308 49 215 142
qPCR < 0.05 p/μL 2 478 59 421 2 478
Sensitivity 70.9% 86.3% 1.22 (1.15–1.29) < 0.0001 60.2% 0.85 (0.80–0.89) < .0001
Specificity 99.6% 87.7% 0.04 (0.01–0.14) < 0.0001 99.6% 1.0 (0.07–13.8) 1.0
PPV 99.2% 83.9% 99.1%
NPV 82.1% 89.6% 77.1%

Pos positive, neg negative, HRP2 histidine-rich protein 2, pLDH pan-Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase, qPCR qualitative polymerase chain reaction, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value