Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 1;199(11):1312–1334. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201904-0717ST

Table 1.

Longitudinal Population-based Studies of Occupational Risk for Asthma

First Author, Year, Location (Reference) Study Type Incident Cases (n [Total Population]) Definition of Exposure PAF (%)
Katz, 1999, Israel (30) Population follow-up ages 18–21 yr at baseline 588 (59,058) Military exposure combat or maintenance vs. clerical 44
Karjalainen, 2001, Finland (31) Population follow-up ages 25–59 yr at baseline 49,575 (1,852,848) Work-related compensation 22
Eagan, 2002, Norway (25) Population follow-up ages 15–70 yr at baseline 101 (2,723) Self-reported dust and fume exposure at baseline 14
LeVan, 2006, Singapore (27) Population follow-up ages 13–44 yr at baseline 1,426 (52,325) Occupations exposed to dust, smoke, or vapors 8.6
Kogevinas, 2007, international (32) Population follow-up ages 20–44 yr at baseline 133 (6,837) Exposure to high-risk substances by JEM 11
Hedlund, 2006, Sweden (33) Population follow-up ages 36–37, 50–52, and 66–67 yr at baseline 271 (5,933) Blue collar industrial workers vs. others 9
Lillienberg, 2013, international (28) Population follow-up in RHINE population ages 20–44 yr at baseline 129 males (5,933) Exposure to high-risk substances by JEM 14
286 females (6,253) 7
Hoy, 2013, Australia (Tasmania) (26) Population follow-up ages 13–44 yr at baseline 290 (792*) Exposure to high-risk substances by JEM 10
Ghosh, 2013, UK (29) Population follow-up of birth cohort up to age 42 yr 611 (7,088) Any asthma JEM >0 16.3

Definition of abbreviations: JEM = job exposure matrix; PAF = population attributable fraction; RHINE = Respiratory Health in Northern Europe; UK = United Kingdom.

The pooled estimated PAF for the occupational contribution to incident asthma was 16% (95% confidence interval, 10–22%).

*

Subjects with asthma at baseline excluded.

Total before subjects with childhood asthma were excluded.