Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 1;199(11):1312–1334. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201904-0717ST

Table 4.

Case-Referent Studies of Occupational Risk Factors for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

First Author, Year, Location (Reference) Cases (N) IPF Case Definition Criteria OR (95% CI)
PAF (%)
VGDF Metal Wood Ag Silica VGDF Metal Wood Ag Silica
Scott, 1990, UK (77) 40 Clinical, CXR, PFT 1.3 (0.8–2.0) 11.0 (2.3–52.4) 2.9 (0.9–9.9) 10.9 (1.2–96) 1.6 (0.5–4.8) 17 12 10 12 5
Hubbard, 1996, UK (79) 218 Clinical, CXR, CT, PFT NA 1.7 (1.1–2.7) 1.7 (1.0–2.9) NA NA NA 10 6 NA NA
Mullen, 1998, USA (80) 15 Clinical, lung biopsy, CT 2.4 (0.7–8.4) NA 3.3 (0.4–25.8) NA 11.0 (1.1–115) 20 NA 7 NA 20
Baumgartner, 2000, USA (81) 248 Clinical, biopsy, CT NA 2.0 (1.0–4.0) 1.6 (0.8–3.3) 1.6 (1.0–2.5) 3.9 (1.2–12.7) NA 5 3 7 2
Hubbard, 2000, UK (82) 22 Death certificate NA 1.1 (0.4–2.7) NA NA NA NA 5 NA NA NA
Miyake, 2005, Japan (83) 102 Lung biopsy, BAL, CT 5.6 (2.1–17.9) 9.6 (1.7–181.1) 6 (0.3–112.4) NA 1.8 (0.5–7.0) 26 11 4 NA 5
Gustafson, 2007, Sweden (84) 140 Pulmonary fibrosis requiring tissue 1.1 (0.7–1.7) 0.9 (0.5–1.6) 1.2 (0.7–2.2) NA 1.4 (0.7–2.7) 6 NA 3 NA 3
García-Sancho, 2011, Mexico (87) 100 Clinical, CT, lung biopsy 2.8 (1.5–5.5) NA NA NA NA 50 NA NA NA NA
Awadalla, 2012, Egypt (Men) (88) 95 Clinical, CT, PFT NA 1.6 (0.7–3.6) 2.7 (1.1–6.8) 1.0 (0.4–2.3) 1.1 (0.5–2.7) NA 6 9 NA 1
Awadalla, 2012, Egypt (Women) (88) 106 Clinical, CT, PFT NA NA 4.3 (0.8–22.1) 3.3 (1.2–10.1) NA NA NA 6 14 NA
Paolocci, 2013, Italy (92) 65 Clinical, CT NA 2.8 (1.1–7.2) 1.1 (0.4–3.3) (soft wood) NA 2.0 (0.9–4.4) NA 9 0 NA 11
0.9 (0.3–2.8) (hard wood) 0
Koo, 2017, Korea (91) 78 Clinical, CT 2.7 (0.7–10.9) 5.0 (1.4–18.2) 2.5 (0.5–12.4) NA 1.2 (0.4–3.8) 35 22 5 NA 5

Definition of abbreviations: Ag = agricultural dusts; CI = confidence interval; CT = computed tomography; CXR = chest radiograph; IPF = idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; NA = not applicable; OR = odds ratio; PAF = population attributable fraction; PFT = pulmonary function test; UK = United Kingdom; USA = United States; VGDF = vapors, gas, dust, or fumes, which represent all the exposure categories shown combined and, in selected studies, additional exposures as well.

All studies had case–control designs, with most by interview-based self-reported exposure assessment (Hubbard exposure by job category). Awadalla and colleagues stratified their study sample by male (n = 95) and female (n =  106). The study by Paolocci and colleagues, which estimated risk with two separate wood variables, later appeared as a full publication (89).