Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 1;199(11):1312–1334. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201904-0717ST

Table 7.

Occupational Associations with Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

First Author, Year, Location (Reference) Study Type Cases (N) Disease Definition Exposure/Job Information Comments Occupational Burden (%)
Kawanami, 1983, USA (168) Case series 18 Clinical, radiographic, physiologic, and laboratory data History, clinical data, and serologic testing in 13 patients 72.2% environmental; 27.7% unknown cause 0
Yoshida, 1995, Japan (169) Case series 835 Criteria of the Japan Research Committee on Diffuse Pulmonary Disease for Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis History, clinical data, and serologic testing 79.4% environmental; 6.8% unknown cause 13.8
Yoshizawa, 1999, Japan (170) Case series 36 Clinical and imaging criteria History, clinical data, and serologic testing 61.4% environmental; 13.9% unknown cause, series limited to chronic HP 25.3
Thomeer, 2001, Belgium (171) Multicenter disease registry 47 A set of clinical and imaging criteria; data from the nationwide electronic register Not clearly stated 76.6% environmental; 23.4% unknown cause 0
Bang, 2006, USA (172) Death certificate date 814 Death certificate coding Occupationally related ICD codes for causes>100% due to multiple coded causes of HP 38.4% occupational; 55.6% unknown cause 40.5
Hanak, 2007, USA (173) Case series from a single center 85 Clinical and imaging criteria from the Mayo Clinic database History, clinical data, and serologic testing 64.7% environmental; 24.7% unknown cause 10.6
Olson, 2008, USA (174) Case series from a single center 4 Retrospective case review; only cases with acute exacerbation of fibrotic HP History, clinical data, and serologic testing; biopsy confirmation 50% environmental; 50% unknown cause 0
Selman, 2010, multicountry (166) Prospective multicenter cohort study 199 Clinical and imaging data, supported by the experts’ opinion History, clinical data, and serologic testing 76.9% environmental; 1.5% unknown cause 21.6
Cımrın, 2010, Turkey (175) Review of published cases 22 Based on cases as defined in publications reviewed Heterogeneous 66.6% environmental; none of unknown cause 33.3
Caillaud, 2012, France (176) Case series, multicenter 139 Clinical and imaging criteria History, clinical data, and serologic testing 18.7% environmental; none of unknown cause 81.3
Alhamad, 2013, Saudi Arabia (177) Case series 21 A set of clinical and imaging criteria followed by expert review Questionnaire 42.9% environmental; 33.3% unknown cause 23.8
Castonguay, 2015, USA (178) Case series 40 Clinical and imaging criteria History, clinical data, and serologic testing; case overlap with Hanak et al., 2007 (173) 55% environmental; 37.5% unknown cause 7.5
Millerick-May, 2016, USA (179) Case series 19 ATS guidelines for the diagnosis of ILD History, clinical data, and serologic testing 51.9% environmental; none of unknown cause 42.1
Singh, 2017, India (180) Prospective registry 513 Diagnostic criteria, expert review Questionnaire 69.4% environmental; 24.8% unknown cause 5.8
Cramer, 2016 Denmark (167) Retrospective cohort study 6,920 Cases identified from records in Danish National Patient Register Data on occupation were provided by Statistics Denmark OR, 1.55 (95% CI, 1.40–1.72); cases exposed = 46% 20.2

Definition of abbreviations: ATS = American Thoracic Society; CI = confidence interval; HP = hypersensitivity pneumonitis; ICD = International Classification of Diseases; ILD = interstitial lung disease; OR = odds ratio; USA = United States.

Occupational burden is derived from the proportion of occupationally attributed cases in the series or, in the case of Cramer and colleagues (167), derived from the OR and proportion of exposed cases. The overall burden of occupationally attributed HP is 19% (95% CI, 12–28%).