Skip to main content
. 2019 May 31;2019(5):CD004680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004680.pub3

Summary of findings 2. Buried (subcutaneous) versus non‐buried catheter for preventing catheter‐related infections in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients.

Buried (subcutaneous) versus non‐buried catheter for preventing catheter‐related infections in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients
Patient or population: chronic peritoneal dialysis patients
 Intervention: buried (subcutaneous) catheter
 Comparison: non‐buried catheter
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No. of participants or patient‐months
 (studies) Certainty of the evidence
 (GRADE)
Risk with non‐buried Risk with buried (subcutaneous)
Peritonitis rate (patient‐months) 37 per 1,000 43 per 1,000
 (14 to 133) RR 1.16
 (0.37 to 3.60) 2511 (2) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 VERY LOW 1
Exit‐site/tunnel infection rate (patient‐months) 31 per 1,000 36 per 1,000
 (12 to 106) RR 1.15
 (0.39 to 3.42) 2511 (2) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 VERY LOW 1
Technique failure 367 per 1,000 268 per 1,000
 (125 to 568) RR 0.73
 (0.34 to 1.55) 60 (1) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 VERY LOW 2
Death (all causes) 169 per 1,000 153 per 1,000
 (66 to 353) RR 0.90
 (0.39 to 2.08) 119 (2) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 3
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
 Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
 Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
 Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded three levels: suboptimal quality, inconsistency, and imprecision

2 Downgraded three levels: single study, suboptimal quality, and imprecision

3 Downgraded two levels: suboptimal quality of studies and imprecision