Summary of findings 2. Buried (subcutaneous) versus non‐buried catheter for preventing catheter‐related infections in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients.
Buried (subcutaneous) versus non‐buried catheter for preventing catheter‐related infections in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients | |||||
Patient or population: chronic peritoneal dialysis patients Intervention: buried (subcutaneous) catheter Comparison: non‐buried catheter | |||||
Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | No. of participants or patient‐months (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | |
Risk with non‐buried | Risk with buried (subcutaneous) | ||||
Peritonitis rate (patient‐months) | 37 per 1,000 | 43 per 1,000 (14 to 133) | RR 1.16 (0.37 to 3.60) | 2511 (2) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ VERY LOW 1 |
Exit‐site/tunnel infection rate (patient‐months) | 31 per 1,000 | 36 per 1,000 (12 to 106) | RR 1.15 (0.39 to 3.42) | 2511 (2) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ VERY LOW 1 |
Technique failure | 367 per 1,000 | 268 per 1,000 (125 to 568) | RR 0.73 (0.34 to 1.55) | 60 (1) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ VERY LOW 2 |
Death (all causes) | 169 per 1,000 | 153 per 1,000 (66 to 353) | RR 0.90 (0.39 to 2.08) | 119 (2) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 3 |
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio | |||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect |
1 Downgraded three levels: suboptimal quality, inconsistency, and imprecision
2 Downgraded three levels: single study, suboptimal quality, and imprecision
3 Downgraded two levels: suboptimal quality of studies and imprecision