Skip to main content
. 2019 May 31;2019(5):CD004680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004680.pub3

Comparison 3. Midline versus lateral insertion.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Peritonitis 2 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.32, 1.33]
2 Exit‐site/tunnel infection 2 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.12, 2.58]
3 Catheter removal or replacement 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Death (all causes) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected