Skip to main content
. 2019 May 31;2019(5):CD004680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004680.pub3

Comparison 16. Triple cuff versus double catheter.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Peritonitis 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Peritonitis rate (patient‐months) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Exit‐site/tunnel infection 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Exit‐site/tunnel infection (patient‐months) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Catheter removal or replacement 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
6 Dialysate leak 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected