Skip to main content
. 2019 May 31;2019(5):CD004680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004680.pub3

Dasgupta 1998.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Study time frame/recruitment period: not reported

  • Follow‐up period: 14.3 months for Moncrief‐Popovich catheter group and 15.8 months for Tenckhoff catheter group

Participants
  • Country: Canada

  • Setting: Single centre

  • PD patients

  • Number: treatment group (19); control group (20)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): not reported

  • Sex (M/F): not reported

  • Diabetes: not reported

  • Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions Treatment group
  • Moncrief‐Popovich catheter


Control group
  • Tenckhoff catheter

Outcomes
  • Catheter survival

Notes
  • Unable to contact author for additional data

  • Abstract‐only publication

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Reported few outcomes
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement