Skip to main content
. 2019 May 31;2019(5):CD004680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004680.pub3

Eklund 1997.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Study time frame/recruitment period: October 1991 to June 1993

  • Follow‐up period: 1841 days

Participants
  • Country: Finland

  • Setting: single centre

  • Consecutive patients selected for CAPD

  • Number: treatment group (30); control group (30)

  • Mean age, range (years): treatment group (42.8, 22 to 67); control group (45.1, 25 to 64)

  • Sex (M/F): treatment group (20/10); control group (20/10)

  • Diabetes: treatment group (6/30); control group (10/30)

  • Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions Treatment group
  • Single‐cuff Tenckhoff, straight tip


Control group
  • Double‐cuff Tenckhoff, straight tip


Other information
  • Spinal anaesthesia used for all patients

Outcomes
  • Peritonitis: 2 of the following criteria ‐ abdominal pain, cloudy dialysate with leucocytes > 100/mm³ with > 50% polymorphonuclear cells, or positive dialysate culture

  • Exit‐site infection: erythema with or without skin induration and/or purulent discharge for the exit site

  • Death

Notes
  • Funding source: not reported

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No dropouts
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Unclear, unable to totally exclude reporting bias
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement