Table 2. Optimal ranges of hybridization temperature, NaCl and denaturant concentration predicted through the RSM models for the tested bacteria.
Denaturant | Bacteria | Hybridization conditions | Predicted fluorescence (a.u.) | Obtained fluorescence (a.u.)* | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Temperature (°C) | [NaCl] (M) | [Denaturant] (M; % v/v) | ||||
Formamide | E. coli | 51.4–76.1 | 0.03–1.99 | 1.18–4.40 | 296.13–348.87 | 369.14 ±32.62 |
P. aeruginosa | 56.4–74.2 | 2.11–4.92 | 4.27–12.80 | 322.97–379.97 | 225.30 ± 14.58 | |
C. freundii | 50.0–79.0 | 2.25–5.00 | 9.00–17.69 | 113.76–133.83 | 141.26 ± 38.86 | |
E. faecalis | 50.0–69.3 | 2.66–5.00 | 22.00–32.81 | 288.31–339.19 | 131.15 ± 4.31 | |
S. epidermidis | 62.0–82.0 | 2.00–5.00 | 3.00–13.00 | 47.51–55.89 | 296.62 ± 46.55 | |
Ethylene carbonate | E. coli | 55.5–77.9 | 2.00–5.00 | 3.13–12.42 | 278.02–327.08 | 346.03 ± 19.93 |
P. aeruginosa | 53.8–78.1 | 2.03–3.42 | 4.02–12.71 | 196.01–230.61 | 291.57 ± 14.15 | |
C. freundii | 57.9–79.0 | 2.00–4.89 | 3.76–13.00 | 266.56–313.59 | 353.14 ± 12.17 | |
E. faecalis | 46.0–63.0 | 2.00–5.00 | 1.00–4.00 | 174.27–205.03 | 126.34 ± 20.76 | |
S. epidermidis | 62.0–82.0 | 2.90–5.00 | 0.00–2.00 | 106.68–125.50 | 254.37 ± 17.45 | |
Urea | E. coli | 50.1–60.0 | 2.41–5.01 | 1.41–4.09 | 189.217–236.52 | 253.87 ± 13.73 |
P. aeruginosa | 47.1–58.1 | 2.45–5.01 | 0.67–2.37 | 395.90–465.75 | 324.35 ± 18.26 | |
C. freundii | 50.2–63.3 | 2.42–4.57 | 0.63–2.08 | 183.51–215.89 | 225.82 ± 39.74 | |
E. faecalis | 50.1–79.9 | 2.59–5.01 | 1.41–4.09 | 345.03–405.92 | 205.58 ± 17.75 | |
S. epidermidis | 64.2–82.9 | 3.37–5.01 | 0.61–1.84 | 188.04–221.22 | 314.17 ± 21.52 |
*The obtained fluorescence was evaluated using the optimum hybridization temperature, denaturant and salt concentration predicted through the RSM models for each bacterium.