Skip to main content
. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217689

Table 2. Optimal ranges of hybridization temperature, NaCl and denaturant concentration predicted through the RSM models for the tested bacteria.

The predicted and experimental fluorescence values are also shown. Optimum ranges for each parameter have been stablished assuming a fluorescence intensity of at least 85% of the maximum value.

Denaturant Bacteria Hybridization conditions Predicted fluorescence (a.u.) Obtained fluorescence (a.u.)*
Temperature (°C) [NaCl] (M) [Denaturant] (M; % v/v)
Formamide E. coli 51.4–76.1 0.03–1.99 1.18–4.40 296.13–348.87 369.14 ±32.62
P. aeruginosa 56.4–74.2 2.11–4.92 4.27–12.80 322.97–379.97 225.30 ± 14.58
C. freundii 50.0–79.0 2.25–5.00 9.00–17.69 113.76–133.83 141.26 ± 38.86
E. faecalis 50.0–69.3 2.66–5.00 22.00–32.81 288.31–339.19 131.15 ± 4.31
S. epidermidis 62.0–82.0 2.00–5.00 3.00–13.00 47.51–55.89 296.62 ± 46.55
Ethylene carbonate E. coli 55.5–77.9 2.00–5.00 3.13–12.42 278.02–327.08 346.03 ± 19.93
P. aeruginosa 53.8–78.1 2.03–3.42 4.02–12.71 196.01–230.61 291.57 ± 14.15
C. freundii 57.9–79.0 2.00–4.89 3.76–13.00 266.56–313.59 353.14 ± 12.17
E. faecalis 46.0–63.0 2.00–5.00 1.00–4.00 174.27–205.03 126.34 ± 20.76
S. epidermidis 62.0–82.0 2.90–5.00 0.00–2.00 106.68–125.50 254.37 ± 17.45
Urea E. coli 50.1–60.0 2.41–5.01 1.41–4.09 189.217–236.52 253.87 ± 13.73
P. aeruginosa 47.1–58.1 2.45–5.01 0.67–2.37 395.90–465.75 324.35 ± 18.26
C. freundii 50.2–63.3 2.42–4.57 0.63–2.08 183.51–215.89 225.82 ± 39.74
E. faecalis 50.1–79.9 2.59–5.01 1.41–4.09 345.03–405.92 205.58 ± 17.75
S. epidermidis 64.2–82.9 3.37–5.01 0.61–1.84 188.04–221.22 314.17 ± 21.52

*The obtained fluorescence was evaluated using the optimum hybridization temperature, denaturant and salt concentration predicted through the RSM models for each bacterium.