Table 4. Results for centrality and cohesiveness measures over all 48 monthly networks.
The networks are based on the data from one transport company (TRP).
| Min. | 25% | Median | Mean | 75% | Max. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network 1 (direct) | ||||||||
| Centrality | ||||||||
| Max. in-degree | 8 | 13 | 19 | 18 | 23 | 35 | ||
| Max. out-degree | 11 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 19 | 24 | ||
| Max. ICC | 9 | 16 | 21 | 22 | 25 | 46 | ||
| Max. OCC | 13 | 22 | 26 | 26 | 30 | 38 | ||
| Cohesiveness | ||||||||
| Size of WCC | 331 (35.4%) |
465 (47.1%) |
483 (49.9%) |
484 (49.6%) |
521 (53.8%) |
578 (58.5%) |
||
| Size of SCC | 4 (0.4%) |
5 (0.5%) |
5 (0.5%) |
6 (0.6%) |
6 (0.7%) |
8 (0.8%) |
||
| Reachability ratio | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.11% | ||
| Network 2 (shared truck) | ||||||||
| Centrality | ||||||||
| Max. in-degree | 9 | 15 | 19 | 20 | 24 | 37 | ||
| Max. out-degree | 15 | 19 | 21 | 22 | 24 | 31 | ||
| Max. ICC | 10 | 19 | 24 | 25 | 31 | 50 | ||
| Max. OCC | 20 | 30 | 32 | 33 | 37 | 42 | ||
| Cohesiveness | ||||||||
| Size of WCC | 367 (40.2%) |
529 (54.0%) |
557 (57.3%) |
551 (56.4%) |
583 (59.6%) |
659 (63.4%) |
||
| Size of SCC | 4 (0.4%) |
5 (0.5%) |
5 (0.6%) |
6 (0.6%) |
7 (0.7%) |
9 (0.9%) |
||
| Reachability ratio | 0.08% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.11% | 0.13% | ||
| Network 3 (contaminated truck) | ||||||||
| Centrality | ||||||||
| Max. in-degree | 14 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 30 | 50 | ||
| Max. out-degree | 20 | 25 | 28 | 28 | 31 | 34 | ||
| Max. ICC | 24 | 36 | 43 | 44 | 49 | 81 | ||
| Max. OCC | 36 | 48 | 53 | 52 | 57 | 70 | ||
| Cohesiveness | ||||||||
| Size of WCC | 675 (74.5%) |
738 (76.7%) |
765 (78.2%) |
766 (78.5%) |
799 (79.8%) |
860 (84.0%) |
||
| Size of SCC | 5 (0.5%) |
7 (0.7%) |
9 (0.9%) |
9 (0.9%) |
11 (1.2%) |
17 (1.8%) |
||
| Reachability ratio | 0.20% | 0.22% | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 0.34% | ||