Skip to main content
. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217923

Table 1. Results for patients’ experience of care.

General items related to the experience of care A
Intervention group (PC+) (N = 370) Control group
(HBOC) (N = 291)
P-value B
Satisfied
% (n)C
Satisfied
% (n)C
Satisfaction with waiting time for appointment* 98.1% (362) 85.1% (245) <0.000
Findability of location 98.4% (364) 99.0% (286) 0.522
Feeling welcome and comfortable* 99.5% (368) 91.4% (265) <0.000
Helpful healthcare assistant* 100.0% (370) 97.3% (283) 0.001
Understandable explanation by healthcare assistant* 99.7% (369) 95.5% (274) <0.000
Sufficient facilities in waiting room* 98.6% (365) 82.5% (236) <0.000
Healthcare professionals were informed about the complaint* 95.7% (353) 86.0% (246) <0.000
Complaint was taken seriously* 99.5% (368) 95.1% (274) <0.000
Healthcare professionals listened carefully* 98.9% (365) 94.8% (275) 0.002
Healthcare professionals spent enough time* 99.5% (368) 95.5% (277) 0.001
Healthcare professionals treated you with respect* 100.0% (369) 95.5% (274) <0.000
Competence of healthcare professionals* 100.0% (370) 98.6% (278) 0.022
Overall help of healthcare professionals* 100.0% (370) 95.1% (274) <0.000
Understandable explanation of healthcare professionals* 99.7% (368) 94.1% (271) <0.000
Opportunity to ask questions* 98.4% (364) 93.8% (270) 0.002
Collaboration and alignment with GP* 98.1% (355) 87.5% (251) <0.000
Specific items related to the experience of care with the medical specialist (i.e. the cardiologist)
Intervention group
(N = 370)
Control group
(N = 291)
P-valueB
The medical specialist … Satisfied
% (n)C
Satisfied
% (n)C
… took enough time* 99.5% (365) 93.1% (270) <0.000
… was informed about complaint* 95.9% (352) 91.3% (262) 0.014
. . . explained the results of the consultation and diagnostics sufficiently and in an understandable way* 99.2% (362) 94.1% (271) <0.000
… provided information about treatment options* 95.5% (340) 90.4% (253) 0.010
… involved the patient in decision about the treatment* 89.0% (154) 78.4% (127) 0.008
Additional items related to the patients’ experience of care
Intervention group
(N = 370)
Control group
(N = 291)
P-value B
Yes % (n)C Yes % (n)C
Waiting time for appointment less than 8 days* 83.5% (308) 36.1% (103) <0.000
Waiting time in waiting room less than 30 minutes* 92.7% (342) 87.1% (250) 0.017
Recommend PC+ centre/ hospital to family and friends* 99.5% (367) 92.0% (266) <0.000
Recommend medical specialist to family and friends* 98.1% (358) 89.0% (252) <0.000
Grades
Intervention group
mean (±SD) (N = 370)
Control group
mean (±SD) (N = 291)
P-value B
Grade for PC+ centre / HBOC (0–10)* 9.04 (±0.95) 8.05 (±1.14) <0.000 D
Grade for medical specialist (0–10)* 8.91 (±1.06) 8.27 (±1.33) <0.000 E

Notes

* Item on which the groups differ significantly with a p-value < 0.05

A All Healthcare professionals involved, including doctors’ assistants and nurses at the PC+ centre/ hospital

B A chi-square test was used to test whether the two groups differ significantly

C The n represents the number of responses on the particular item, missing values are excluded (the N represents the response on the questionnaire)

D 95% CI = -1.143 –-0.824;

E 95% CI = -0.828 –-0.451.