Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 31.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 May;12(5):e008130. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.008130

Figure 4. Differences in flow component percentage, kinetic energy at end diastole and average kinetic energy according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Figure 4

LVEF>55%, n=4; EF 45-54% n=11; EF 36-44% n=21; EF≤35%, n=28. Panels A, D, G and J bars show mean value and error bars indicate standard deviation. Other panels bars show minimum and maximum values. *P<0.05 compared to controls, §P<0.05 LVEF≤35% compared to 45-54%, ∂P<0.05 LVEF≤35% compared to ≥55%, #P<0.05 LVEF 36-44% compared to 45-54%. EDV, end diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; KE ED, kinetic energy end diastole.