a, WT* biofilms grown under strong shear display droplet-like shapes. Inset: Biovolume
flux field inside the biofilm (see Supplementary Information). b, WT* biofilms in
high shear display strong alignment with flow throughout
growth, yet biofilms grown in flow with low shear do not show strong architectural modifications.
c, Quantification of the effect of shear on biofilm
architecture: measurements of cellular alignment with flow, cell-cell distance,
and cell growth rate at the bottom and top of biofilms with sizes of
Ncells ~800 cells show that WT* biofilms
in high shear are smaller, more compact, and display stronger flow-alignment.
Statistical significance: * is p < 0.05 and ** is
p < 0.01 (t-test); error bars are standard error
(n = 4 biofilms, error bars: standard errors).
d, Simulated shear stress distribution for a WT* biofilm,
demonstrating that the region of highest shear is at the top of the biofilm. The
streamlines indicate the profile of the external flow. e, Biofilm
aspect ratio (height/width) increases in time for WT* (red) biofilms, but
decreases for ΔrbmA mutant biofilms (blue) in high flow
owing to shear-induced erosion (n = 4, error bars: standard
deviations). f, Biomass shift is defined as the fraction of the
average total biomass flux through planes parallel (‖) or perpendicular
(⊥) to flow (see Supplementary Fig. 2 for details). Positive biomass shift along the
flow direction at higher shear rates indicates anisotropic biofilm expansion
towards the downstream direction of the external flow. Zero biomass shift
perpendicular to the flow indicates no directional bias (n
≥ 3, error bars: standard errors). g, The tensorial nematic
order parameter (Q-tensor, see Supplementary
Information) and cellular alignment with the flow direction were measured
at equally spaced points inside biofilms at low and high shear rates, indicating
the regions in which cells are predominantly aligned with the flow and each
other. h, Biofilm volumetric growth for
ΔrbmA mutant biofilms is captured by a continuum
model (see Supplementary
Information) with varying ratios of shear-induced erosion and
cell-cell adhesion (experiment: n = 4, error bars: standard
deviations).