Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 24;20(6):1166–1177. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny188

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics (second and fourth columns) and multiple linear regression modeling results (sixth column) showing changes in outcome variables as a function of stimulation (active vs sham tDCS) over time

Score and No., Mean (SD) [Range]
P
Active tDCS No. Sham tDCS No.
DVPRS
 Day 1 5.4 (2.2) [1–9] 10 5.5 (1.1) [4–7] 11 0.97
 Day 5 4.8 (2.7) [0–8] 10 4.6 (2.3) [1–8] 11 0.82
 Day 10 4.0 (2.4) [0–8] 10 4.0 (2.2) [1–8] 11 0.91
 6-wk follow-up 4.3 (2.5) [0–9] 10 4.8 (1.8) [2–8] 10 0.58
WHY-MPI-C
 Day 1 31.3 (16.1) [9–53] 10 36.9 (13.3) [14–60] 11 0.45
 Day 5 39.9 (23.0) [9–85] 10 40.8 (18.9) [8–82] 11 0.41
 Day 10 41.6 (21.9) [12–78] 10 41.0 (15.8) [15–68] 11 0.26
 6-wk follow-up 48.4 (21.2) [15–85] 10 35.3 (17.7) [11–73] 10 0.002*
RMDQ
 Day 1 13.8 (5.4) [5–20] 10 12.5 (4.9) [3–19] 11 0.46
 Day 5 13.2 (6.0) [1–20] 10 12.5 (5.3) [2–21] 11 0.54
 Day 10 12.5 (5.6) [0–19] 10 12.8 (4.1) [4–18] 11 0.13
 6-wk follow-up 12.7 (5.6) [1–20] 10 15.4 (5.5) [3–22] 10 0.001*
CPAQ-8
 Day 1 31.0 (7.2) [22–42] 6 29.9 (10.5) [10–48] 9 0.98
 Day 5 29.8 (5.2) [22–36] 5 27.9 (5.6) [15–35] 9 0.52
 Day 10 30.5 (4.6) [23–36] 6 28.6 (8.4) [14–45] 9 0.74
 6-wk follow-up 32.5 (5.5) [26–42] 6 27.9 (8.6) [14–39] 8 0.40
PHQ-9
 Day 1 11.0 (7.8) [3–22] 10 8.1 (5.2) [0–14] 10 0.27
 Day 5 10.0 (8.3) [0–22] 10 7.0 (4.7) [0–14] 11 0.89
 Day 10 8.9 (7.1) [2–20] 10 6.8 (4.9) [0–15] 11 0.65
 6-wk follow-up 7.4 (6.1) [1–17] 10 8.9 (6.0) [0–17] 10 0.003*
GAD-7
 Day 1 7.5 (7.6) [0–19] 10 8.3 (5.2) [0–14] 11 0.77
 Day 5 7.2 (7.4) [0–18] 10 6.2 (5.9) [0–18] 11 0.31
 Day 10 6.2 (6.7) [0–18] 10 7.0 (6.3) [0–17] 11 0.96
 6-wk follow-up 6.0 (6.6) [0–17] 10 4.9 (4.5) [0–13] 10 0.32
PASS-20
 Day 1 34.4 (22.8) [6–80] 10 37.5 (25.3) [4–74] 11 0.75
 Day 5 34.9 (23.5) [2–78] 10 30.4 (21.2) [2–71] 11 0.27
 Day 10 27.8 (24.2) [0–72] 9 27.4 (21.3) [1–58] 11 0.67
 6-wk follow-up 26.3 (23.6) [0–59] 10 26.4 (22.0) [1–71] 10 0.67
CEQ
 Day 1 35.9 (7.8) [25.2–51.6] 10 38.5 (7.6) [29.6–53.2] 11 0.49
 Day 10 38.8 (9.7) [23.6–54.0] 9 33.7 (9.0) [22.0–51.6] 10 0.038*
CSQ-8
 Day 1 29.5 (3.3) [21–32] 10 29.2 (2.4) [25–32] 11 0.83
 Day 10 29.3 (2.2) [25–32] 10 28.3 (2.9) [24–32] 11 0.57

All assessments except for CSQ-8 were administered in person at the start of an experimental session before commencing tDCS; CSQ-8 was administered immediately after tDCS finished. Day 1 assessment scores were therefore considered baseline values for the purposes of this study. Statistical significance was defined as the traditional two-tailed P ≤ 0.05. WHY-MPI-C General Activity Subscale, RMDQ, PHQ-9, and CEQ all showed significant improvements at the six-week follow-up telephone assessment, which occurred on average 6.2 weeks after the day 10 tDCS session (tDCS sessions occurred only on weekdays); one PVAMC participant was lost to 6-week follow-up. The third and fifth columns report the No. of participants included in the model for a particular condition and measure at a given time point. Differences from the last column of Table 2 are due to CPAQ-8 not being obtained in all participants, the participant lost to follow-up, and missed/incomplete measures from other participants. See the Methods for how missing data were handled. CEQ is provided as a total score that could range from 6 to 54; see the text for full details of how this was calculated. For simplicity, DVPRS is reported only for the following time points: day 1, day 5, day 10, and 6-week follow-up.

CEQ = Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire; CPAQ-8 = Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire; CSQ-8 = Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8; DVPRS = Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale; GAD-7 = Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale; PASS-20 = Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale; PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire; RMDQ = Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; tDCS = transcranial direct current stimulation; WHY-MPI-C = West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory’s General Activity Subscale.