Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 1;2019(6):CD004048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004048.pub4

Clark 1996.

Methods Study design: single‐blind, parallel, randomised controlled study
Participants Diagnosis: bipolar affective disorder manic phase
Method of diagnosis: DSM IV
Age: "matched"
Sex: "matched"
Location: not given
Co‐morbidities: not described but exclusion criteria included other axis 1&2 disorders
Adjunctive therapy: none
Adjunctive medication: in the event of agitation not being controlled on the study medication, clothiapine, a low potency neuroleptic, at a dose of 40 ± 120 mg was given on an as‐needed basis to a maximum of 240 mg daily.
Controlled seclusion periods were also an option in this situation. Extrapyramidal symptoms were treated with orphenadrine 50 ± 150 mg daily on as‐needed basis.
Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to either:
Experimental armlithium
N = 20
Duration: 4 weeks
Treatment protocol: participants were started on lithium at a dose of 250 mg three times a day, which was adjusted on an individual basis to achieve a blood level of 0.6 ± 1.2 mmol/L to a maximum of 1800 mg per day. Once the regimen
 was commenced, no other routine psychotropic medications were administered.
Therapist/face‐to‐face contact: not described
Comparator arm ‐ clonazepam
N = 20
Duration: 4 weeks
Treatment protocol: participants were started on clonazepam at a dose of 2 mg four times daily increasing as needed to a maximum of 16 mg per day. Once the regimen
 was commenced, no other routine psychotropic medications were administered
Outcomes Timepoints for assessment: 3, 10, 21, 28 days
Primary outcome:
  1. MRS


Secondary outcome:
  1. BPRS

  2. GAF

  3. CGI

  4. SAS

Notes Date of study: not described
Funding source: not described
Declarations of interest among the primary researchers: not described
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Authors admitted that it was possible blinding had been broken at times
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The study sample consisted of 15 participants on lithium and 15 participants on clonazepam. One participant in the clonazepam group absconded from the hospital on day 10 but was included in the analysis on an intend‐to‐treat basis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Well reported
Other bias Low risk None identified